Eberechi Eze: Arsenal face major criticism after Forest clash
Paul Merson has raised fresh questions about Eberechi Eze’s fit at Arsenal after another subdued display, with the forward being substituted at half-time in the Gunners’ 1-0 win over Nottingham...

Paul Merson has raised fresh questions about Eberechi Eze’s fit at Arsenal after another subdued display, with the forward being substituted at half-time in the Gunners’ 1-0 win over Nottingham Forest.
Table Of Content
Merson questions Eze’s suitability at the Emirates
The former Arsenal midfielder spoke to Sky Sports after Arsenal’s narrow victory, suggesting that Eze’s previous form for Crystal Palace may not translate to life at a club with multiple established attackers. He argued that the bar for individual performances is higher at a top side and that Eze’s half-time withdrawal against Forest signaled the increased scrutiny he faces.
“I’ve played for big teams and I’ve played for teams that weren’t big – it’s a different game. Eberechi Eze is a prime example. It’s so, so different,” Merson said. “He was substituted at half-time against Forest, but if he played like that for Crystal Palace, he would still be on the pitch. You’ve got to perform at Arsenal. You’ve got to play in a shape. You can’t just play your own game. You can’t be a free spirit at big clubs anymore.”
Performance details and context
Since his high-profile move from Crystal Palace, Eze has found it difficult to sustain form for Arsenal. He started on the left wing against Forest but completed 45 minutes without a shot or a successful dribble before being replaced by Noni Madueke, who later netted the game’s winning goal in the 80th minute.
Merson also pointed out the difference in how attacks are structured at Palace versus Arsenal. “At Palace, the team talk is ‘give the ball to Eze, everything goes through him and then we’ll work from there’. You go to Arsenal, there are four of them. Give the ball to Bruno. Give the ball to Bukayo Saka. Give the ball to Martin Odegaard. Give the ball to Declan Rice.”
Why the remarks matter for Eze and Arsenal
The comments underline two immediate challenges for Eze: adapting to Arteta’s tactical framework, which emphasizes coordinated attacking moves and shared responsibilities, and breaking into a crowded forward line where opportunities are limited and competition for starts is intense.
For Arsenal, the substitution at halftime underscores the manager’s willingness to make swift tactical adjustments in tight matches. It also reflects the depth of the squad and the ease with which a player can be withdrawn if his contribution does not align with the plan.
Supporting data from the match
During his 45 minutes on the pitch, Eze did not register a shot or a completed dribble. Those statistics provided a factual basis for Merson’s critique and for Arteta’s decision to switch him at the interval. Madueke, introduced after the break, went on to score the decisive goal in the 80th minute, highlighting the impact of a well-timed substitute in a close contest.
What happens next
Eberechi Eze now faces a clear test: adjust quickly to Arsenal’s structure and secure regular starting minutes, or remain a fringe option. Arteta’s rotation approach and Eze’s response in training and upcoming fixtures will determine whether he can recapture the form that stood out during his time at Crystal Palace. For Arsenal, maintaining momentum in the league while managing a crowded attacking group remains a priority.
Merson’s public doubts add pressure but also reflect a broader Premier League reality: consistent performance at a club of Arsenal’s stature demands both individual quality and tactical discipline.
Source: Original report




